Is Black Britain an illusion?

October 28, 2009 at 9:02 pm (Africans, black community, black people, colonialism, families, multicultralism, society, the caribbean, the diaspora, the world, west indians) (, , , , , , , , , , , , )

www.charcoalink.wordpress.com/2009/10/24/why-black-britain-is-an-illusion/
Please read Charcoalink’s article before reading mine. Ta!

I love Charcoalink, she is intelligent self assured, and proud. I applaud her, she is ambitious and articulate. However her summation of my community in this post just hurt!! It was painful, i don’t think she could have gotten away with roasting any of the other british ethnic minorities.

A lot of what she said i feel, was worthwhile, but some just smacked of an outsider who had no knowledge of the community, and that is what stang, a white woman would be torn down for being “priveiledged” and thinking that one glance could deftly explain the complexities of one minority group, without study.

When my grandparents generation came to this country, they expected the welcome mat, that white colonialists had brainwashed them to expect. They were confronted with a country that scorned them. Landlords that could charge a whole wage packet for substandard housing. Police who would beat and arrest at will and whim whomever they pleased. Employers could discriminate, banks did not lend and morgages were denied not on inability to pay, but on simple discrimination.

So My community fought, they rioted in the streets for equality for all, they fought and lobbied for employment laws that protect us all today, they fought for equality across the board. Housing, schooling,employment and i for one think those are pretty important. WHY did we fight for equality, because we are a proud people We came to work and do well and we found in the late 1940’s that we could not do well because there was discrimination and opression that strangled our development.

For the Majority of the 1960’s I have been told, by relatives. that the thinking was in schools and all educational facilities, that all black children were educationally sub-normal on account of strong west indian accents, those children who did not “bleach” the sound of their mother country from their tongues, were left to languish in the classes for the educationally sub normal classes regardless of ability. Teachers were those born at the earliest 1930 or there abouts, so we can safely assume that they were brought up on tales of empire savages and slaves, it’s not a streach to see how they must have reacted to boisterous west indian children with their stecatto brash accents. So for the best part of the sixties a whole generation was written off.

In the 1970’s to early 1980’s we had the sus laws. Where british police had the right to stop, search or arrest anyone on the suspicion that they , had been, or would be involved in a crime. Black people were targeted on amazing scales and this erupted with the new cross fire. My community had had enough of the flagrant disregard of the establishment.

The new cross fire.
A party held not far from new cross gate station. Held by a West Indian family for a youngster. It was being held in a home. suddenly the house is ablaze, numerous children and young teens are seriously injured. 13 young teenagers die. The fire makes the news. The police investigate claims from injured people that there was a petrol bomb thrown into the living room. The national front had increased activity in the area and several people decide to mobilise the community into campaigning. 2nd march 20,000 black people marched for the lost youths Throughout central london. They campaigned and still campaign for justice two inquests have happened recently i am not quite sure of the exact years but we do care for our community and for our youths.

http://www.newstatesman.com/199902120015 -Darcus Howe’s feelings on the events of the night.
The kind of immigrants we had during the 1940’s to the 1970’s were predominantly families, large families. We took low paid jobs, often beneath our qualifications because we had familes to feed, it was more important that families stayed together, ate together and had a good quality of life that jet set at the exepense of having no quality of life.

Assimilation of the mid 1980’s to present. yes my community is assimilated as far as black people can assimilate. Why? because That is how our colonial background has shaped us, we have no language ties that force difference with our white neighbours, we have no religious difference that separate us from our white neighbours. Some black men (a few black women also) like having sex white people, who are we to stop them? West Indians love each other and their heritage, but we suffer a disadvantage that other minorities do not have.

Our Creole heritage ( when i use the word creole i mean it in the caribbean way not the american way) means we have some of our african traditions, but all, they have been corrupted, diffused and changed, our heritage has been anglicised, we have no language of our own “patois” is understood by all. Other minority groups at least have the option of keeping a bond by using the exclusive mother tongue, we do not share that option.

But to say that we are not proud to be black, because we utilise the term “black british”, is asinine. I am black, I am british, not untruthful, but scratch the surface and i am more than happy to tell you about my heritage. The fact that i am born and bred in England, does not neutralise my west indian culture, west indians cannot be neuteured. We are too proud if any thing.

Permalink 3 Comments

Stereotypes harm us all.

August 1, 2009 at 7:01 pm (bigotry, black community, britain, faith, ignorance, men, misery, religion, sexuality, society, the diaspora, the world, west indians, women) (, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , )

Good afternoon, i was recently sitting down with some people in a “focus group” and before be began to discuss the issue at hand we were all explaining a lttle about ourselves.

One lady was from  South Africa, her heritage was a coloured one to use the afrikaans term, i would say an asian background.

Two men were the prerequisite white english  fellow with their roots  right here in the cold  european soil.

One lady was from the phillipeans, she was a student nurse and very pleasant too!

there were two pakistani’s  one male and one female.

Last but not least there was me, young gifted and black to coin the cliche, from my west indian background, or to the  overly sensitive “english speaking caribbean”.

we had half and hour to go before we began our formal tasks, so we began to share and talk. we talked about this recession, moneym finances and any sign of improvement in the economy. By all accounts we were doing  quite well until  one of the persons above made  a crushing faux pas…..

” well i’ve been out of work for 6 months now, and it would be alright back where you are from, nothing but sunshine, beaches, drinking and lazing around but i’m going to starve if i dont find work soon”

My blood pressure shot right up. i got an instant headache, i fought the immediate urge to thump this person.  How could they feel comfortable enough to say that in front of people they had only just met.

         This incident is not the point of this post but it got me to thinking about the  state of our world and how stereotypes can negatively impact on people even when they seem positive. The person’s idea of  “where you come from” seemed a virtual utopia if it existed i would go, but the point of the comment was the belittle, and diminish the livelyhoods and the work ethic of a whole nation/ ethnicity.

         My favourite stereotype is  the hypersexual black male.  It applies to all black men, regardless of  indivuality. It endows black men with  a penis so large and powerful that   it coined a phrase ” once you go black you won’t go back”. It bestows strength and  a hyper-masculinity, agility  and with it  the “ideal” body lean, tall, muscular and hard. In short according to  this stereotype  black men are hot to the touch red  hot sexual adonis’ with the sexual power to make women ( and some men) to lose all self control.   Here’s the problem….  this stereotype does not allow  for individuality, there is no mention of any intellect, the black man is rendered a sexual beast, with all the bodily trappings of humanity but ultimately no human faculties. I had a teacher when i was 17, she was  plain teacher from the midlands, her husband was 6ft and probably about 20 stones he was obese. she was once saying to me that in a fight Any black man could and would knock out any white or asian man  without ever breaking a sweat. I had to challenge her on that, my father was a slight 5ft 9 and only about 12 stones and i said “my father could never take your husband on in a fight he would be laid out he just wouldn’t have the power behind him” but my teacher  was absolutely resolutely sure  in the supremacy of the  strong black male body.

My second favourite stereotype is the Shy muslim Pakistani woman.  Of late the world has started to fetishise women of Asia but lately i have noticed that the religious element has crept into it all. This stereotype renders all pakistani muslim women , silent, shy , bashful, oppressed, humble and shamefaced. The stereotype is loaded with inuendo and imaginings of  women whose bodies are fetishised by the fact that  they are almost entirely covered. Well let me burst this bubble because it almost makes me weep with anger. whoever thinks that   being either pakistani or muslim  makes a woman silent or opressed is a moron. because whenever i hear those things come up, it is almost always men who say it and they say it in a way that makes me feel that women who are silent or being silenced are something to be coveted. As a woman who has many female friends who are pakistani’s and muslims, can i just say… they are as shy, as bashful, shamefaced,opressed and as humble as the rest as all womanhood.  There is an increasing amount of men who see women from the desi community walking by in  their nijab with only their eyes showing and try and read the eyes of the women for passion and imagine  the breeze passing between hidden bare legs….. these men are perverts. the reason why some men claim desire for these women is to belittle women who they feel are in opposition to these; little more than mysogyny they construct a womanhood they feel is pure , silent, free from all the nagging other women do. the shyness is is opposite to the forthrite manner that most women have. they imagine it is a womanhood that stands in the shadows and is a drudge for her man. To finish i would just like to add pakistani women/ muslim women are women alike us all and  to part them from humanity is beyond fetish, it’s evil, i do not want to brush away any oppression issues that the pakistani community may have vis-a vis honour killings but  all communities  have problems and the pakistani community are changing from within.

The stereotype i love best are those about black women, of course they are closest to my heart. they all contradict each other, so how they have survived so long i do not know but here lets talk about them.  Sapphire, the black woman consummed by rage and anger, she is always shouting, she  corals the world with her tongue.she drives all sane loving men away she is loud and vocal, she is physically strong, in short she is  like a gorgon, an amazonian siren who cannibalises men with her  incredible spirit. Then comes the mammy , fat mentally slow, reliants on others overly motherly and desexualised, this stereotype  is a nuturer like the name the american mammy which i presume is  the version of mummy the english word equivilent to mommy. then there is the jezebel  the youthful, vigourous , wetly pouting  jezebel.  the stereotype is all sex and trades on the curviness that black women are famed for , the typical  african hips that give black women their shapely behinds, the full hard bosoms the  waists that appear unusually small in juxtaposition with large hips.  this stereotype cannot get enough sex and would often “devour” men until the man was spent of all sexual energy this stereotype is the female partner to the hypersexualised black male.         well these stereotypes are laughable because they all contradict each other, sapphires are gorgons spewing bile and hatred , while mammy’s are loving warm and fat, while jezebels are curvy sexual and desirable. these stereotypes were made up to demonise black women and make other races of womanhood look good.  the ideal when most of these stereotypes were created was white womanhood,  white womanhood was presumed to be silent, quiet and faithful, slim and loving to her husband.  so casting black women as the opposite was not only giving white womanhood an opposite but making it seem better.

 while writing and debunking the stereotypes, i could not help but notice how womanhood’s stereotypes expose the misogyny in our society, if a stereotype is “positive”  the women are silent, or quiet or shamefaced. However if the stereotype is bad the woman is considered loud, or vocal, or confronatinal. so in essence this world has to tarvel a lot further than a few nice paper laws that say woman are  equal in status to men when obviously we have many entrenced social  norms.

Permalink 1 Comment

Racial disharmony at the school gates!!

July 7, 2009 at 1:21 pm (bigotry, black people, ignorance, men, misery, multicultralism, racism, society, the world) (, , , , , , , , , )

 Good day, or rather i wish it was. Today dropping  my much younger sister off outside the school, the whistle had been blown  and i  like most of the parents and relatives were leaving.  The Stragglers were all  racing to the gates in an effort to get there before they were closed and they were officially late.

I was standing along side a family friend watching the children move in single file into the building. suddenly we heard shouting. It was the usual suspect  there is always one parent who takes it upon themself to become an unofficial traffic marshall.

A man had pulled into the curb to perform a 3 point turn or a turn in the road as you will.  Mr “blood pressure” then proceeded to race 200 yards down a hill and slam himself as close to the moving vechicle as he dare. ” you can’t come in here, it’s closed ! the same bloody people all the bloody time!!”  people were tutting , in argrement or in disargrement i do not know. the man excuted his turn and left. Mr “blood pressure” then turned to the startled learning assistant and turned on her ” when are people gonna learn! have you done anything about it?” she replied that yes letters had been sent out. “NO NOT JUST TO  EVERYONE, TO THOSE PEOPLE PERSONALLY, IT’S ALWAYS THOSE PEOPLE!! THEY WILL NEVER LEARN!!”.

It was at that point that one mother pulled up across the road . she stopped the car and the kids took off their seatbeats. the handbrake must have slipped a little but then i could see that the mother reapplied it. before her door was even open he started shouting. “OI YOUR KIDS NEED THEIR SEATBEATS ON, DON’T IGNORE ME!!! YOU MUST HAVE SEATBELTS ON IN  THE BACK.” the mother looked startled. the kids looked scared, with his big angry reddish purple face and his  clenched fist and index finger being jabbed at them.  The crowd mummered with a sense of disapproval, we had all seen that, it was simply that the handbrake had slipped and he was  being so rude.  But he was in full swing he must have thought he was whispering, because previously he was roaring. ” YOU STUPID WOMAN, MAKE SURE YOU HAVE SEATBELTS IN THE BACK!  ALWAYS THE SAME BLOODY PEOPLE, THOSE PEOPLE CAN’T DRIVE, THEY CAUSE SO MUCH TRAFFIC! THEY SHOULDN’T BE GIVEN LICENSES.”   At this point i became unnerved, he had only picked out the bad drivers of colour, the black man making a 3 point turn,the Muslim woman whose only mistake was to have not applied the handbrake firmly enough.

He is a police officer, this is the 5th time this year he has done this, singled out bad driving, or some barely there offense and screamed at the top of his lungs at someone, but only if they are ethnically different from himself. the first 3 times i brushed it off as coincidence, but after that and today i think he is acting on some bias in his mind. As  the family friend, her colleague and  myself walked away, we talked about it

Family friend: oh here he goes again.

Colleague: well he is right they don’t think about their childrens safety!

lifeisannoying: what? her handbrake slipped he’s overreacting, he should realise that he’s not at work, there are bigger and more important offenses than that!

Family friend: well it must be hard to switch off a high powered intense job like that?

Colleague : yeah i couldn’t do it

Lifeisannoying: i know a few police officers, my friend is engaged to one , but he’s never as obnoxious as that!

Colleague: he’s not a  just a police officer, he’s an armed officer, guns and all that

Lifeisannoying: WHAT THAT HOTHEADED BASTARD IS WORKING WITH GUNS!!! BLOODY HELL!!!

 My confidence in the police sank to the lowest levels since stephen lawrence was killed and the police managed to let the killers get off. How can i trust the police to be fair, just and a force for good when they arm, militant and possibly racist men?

It goes to show, the media would have you believe that the black man would get out of the car an assault the man, but he didn’t he waved his hand with a look of weary resignation and reversed out, the muslim lady did not have a bomb concealed under her chador, she shrugged shook her head at the man, watched her children across the road and got in her car, but i could see the hurt and embarrassment in her eyes. Nor did i as  “an angry black woman” go over and create a scene as i would have loved to! i simply took a look at his face, and in a few moments will report him and his  behaviour to his superiors.

Permalink 1 Comment

To intervene or not????

June 30, 2009 at 8:41 pm (black community, britain, families, relationships, society, the world) (, , , , , )

Hello, i’m back after a long hiatus!! i am revitalised and ready to blog!

 What i am aim to discuss is the matter of where the boundaries of personal and public behaviour meet!

When people’s behaviour become erractic and maybe even incling towards mental or physical  breakdown/ damage, when do we as outsiders intervene? Psychologist and many an older person will atest to the general public’s reluctance is evidence of modern societies decay and malaise.

We are very risk averse as a community. we would see our young people bullied in the streets, see them tear each other up and fight, very rarely does anyone apprehend them or admonish them;  yet we  cry about the rise of street gangs, not recognising the link. we allow these gangs when we allow kids to fight and be bullied without consequence, we have become scared of our own children and gangs prey on that.

These gand leaders prey on our kids like paedo’s they groom them, give gifts, create an artificial community with it’s own rules and codes and modes of behaviour. It’s a sense of belonging and a strong community these kids get in these gangs , whilse we outside the gangs fail to give the kids a decent community on the outside. 

when growing up, as well as being made aware of manners and correct attire, i had a community with it’s eyes trained at me. if i was involved in any  mistemeanour the elders of my west indian community would have the news back to my various family members faster than text messages,twitter, facebook or any modern innovation. Futhermore my parents would have been dissapointed and upset and my elder relatives would have been furious that i had shamed them.

But now well some people think they know better than to raise children in the manner that people have been raisng them for millenia/ or centuries depending or not you believe in creationism.

The effect of a community was secondary in my development of a sense of moral and civil  behaviour.But for some that extra support could be that extra protection from  harm.

If you saw someone exhibiting strange or worrying behaviour what would you do? Now i am not including in this anything like dangerous,violent or psychotic behaviours just to be clear. would you approach them? would you call a  police community support officer, would you just run like hell, would youwalk by and then worry about them and what happened to them.

It reminds me of the case last year of the cyclist that died in a street, he was passed by 3 cars and no-body until the 4th car thought to call for help, he lay dying in a street and nobodygave him any aid.

it just makes me sad, he  was somebodies son, maybe husband, maybe father. But we are so risk averse that 3 cars drove past and this man expired, because of a lack of altruism.

so in that sprit today i intervened in some troubling events. I walked  uo to see two grown women and they were  arguing and a sullen child was being clutched by one woman, they child was kicking her.

The general gist was that one woman was talling the other that she shouldn’t  tell her child off. the mother was furious….. i had to step in. the child was wild and  contraditing the mother was just making matters worse. the childless woman was advocating that the child would learn what was right from what was wrong by not being informed, she was reasoning that shouting was just barbaric. Great i love it i thought, undermind the child’s primary caregiver right in front of the child! she was not smacking, nor beating, not even pointing.

so i simply walked up and offered ” lady you’re  being very inapropriate, she is not hitting the child, she’s shouting because being kicked hurts and that gets the message across!”  the mother looked gratified, the childless woman gave me a dirty look and just threw her hands up and left.

But what would her version of the world end up like? where people just  let children do what they wanted and they made up their own morality? But then again this woman was the exception, she was doing exactely what i am advocating, but it shows that some people  care enough about the society in which we raise our children, which is always a good thing.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Black beauty and self perception… shadism

May 25, 2009 at 8:42 pm (bigotry, black community, black people, colorism, colourism, media, men, misery, sexuality, shadism, the diaspora, the world, women) (, , , , , , , , , )

 

cassie

gabrielleWhy are these two women in my head line space?

well i was drawn into a worrisome debate over on abagond on black beauty  and historically what that has meant. I became really troubled. Black beauty comes in all shapes and forms, i celebrate your beauty if you are fair or dark, but what worries me is that a LOT of black people do not.

For them only one of these beautiful women is truely beautiful. It’s the one on the left, it’s Cassie.  She is beautiful that is not what i am trying to raise, the fact that women like Gabrielle  are maligned for being dark. why should that be an issue in a worldwide diaspora  where the majority of that diaspora are dark skinned, where Cassie and fair skinned persons are a minority .

My arguement is not one that will degrade the beauty of fair skinned women of colour to uphold and glorify the dark skinned beauty, that is just ignorance, and not what i am about. My arguement is why sooo many people in my community hold so dear to a value system that asks them to hate so much of their self identity.

Too much of this arguement is taken up with mud slinging and to help ourseleves we have to stop.Much is  said of “fair skinned ,high yellow,redbone,red skin, clear skin…” and too much of  “nappy hair,blackie,darkie,….” no wonder we seemed to have regressed from the 1970’s and it’s high ideals of “emancipate yourself from mental slavery” To celebrate the beauty of one does not mean the denial of the other.

Growning up in the 1990’s i knew that the black women were all represented , in my community and  in black media,  vanessa williams, naomi campbell,nia long,tyra banks,alex wek,Crystal rose,Llwella gideon,Angie Le mar,Oprah winfrey,Aaliyah,lil kim,Faith evans, Mya, Lauren Hilllauren hill

,en vogue ( had all shades covered),salt’n'pepper,TLC,Kele le roc, the Honeys and my favourites Eternal. By the end of the 1990’s something started to turn and i cannot say honestly i know what that was. After lauren hill had finished her miseducation releases, i noticed slowly that the women of colour in the media was tipping in favour of the lighter skinned woman. I cant say i minded a lot i will support black women  and i hope we all support each other regardless of small differences.

All of the female singers that recieved good to execellent Pr in england after 2001 were fair to medium in skin tone, we had  ashanti, we had christina millian, we had of course the indestructable machine that is Beyonce knowles, beyoncewe even had her sister solonge knowles. we had tedra moseswe had the rappers trina, we had jackie o. I like most of these artists and they cannot explain this, they have walked into the situation  and  they are trying to earn a crust, but where did the dark skinned singers go? It could be the record companies fear that someone who is so differnt in phenotype to the consumer that the consumer will be put off? is it the conservative hopes of a record producer who feels thata fair skinned female will have better crossover appeal.

 we had Tweet whose first two singles were an absolute treat, and they did well, but then we never heard  her songs or follow up singles , we read about them and wondered why they were not on the radio? we had India arie, who ever was doing her publicity ought to be shot…. She should have been on this morning, on evening magazine shows, but apart from “black radio stations” i only saw things about her buried deep in the papers gigs sections 30 pages in.  but instead we have the beautiful but almost tuneless Rhianna  rhi rhiWe even had the most popular sexual rapper in this decade Khia, she must have made a mint out of the amount i have heard that song in clubs and out and about, but in England they completely remade the video with 3 or four white models and a fair skinned black woman, completely airbrushing her image out. she’s no oil painting but i feels she has her own dirty charm. she really has the dirtiest face i have ever seen, like she has just done something unmentionable and is about to do so again.khia

 the acting world  faired no better, Halle berry was a household name in black household throughout the 1990’s due to her appearance in R kelly videos ( the ones that can be seen legally on music tv not the ones with the underage girls) and her apperance in classic film boomerang.       halleshe is a biracial woman who self identifies as black, we have loved her sooo long. but after her oscar win, she seemed to be the only black actress cast in anything big budget. ( we love halle , hate the game not the player).Nia long was at the corneras working hard , after love jones and soul food , the big guns in hollywood would not let her in, she has done very well for herself in third watch and boston legal. However gabrielle union has cleaned up doing it big in will smith vehicle “bad boys 2″ and bring it on.  But with film there is the added trouble of competition from actresses whose racial identity is seen as less threatening. white actresses or ambigious latina actresses

The gripe in hollywood is “it’s all about money” and if they cast two ethnic leads white people won’t watch and the movie will tank and lose money. FALSE FALSE  look at slumdog millionaire…. all entirely south asian, big hit, we empathised with them not because we shared ethnicity but because we cared.

meanwhile where is Aisha taylor?i think she’s great but if you google her for images you will get not only the actress but about 7 or 8 other aisha taylors and fun snaps they posted of themselves, the same thing does not happen  to talentless losers like audrina from the hills…. life is annoying thonia  so here is a picture of Nia long because she is always cute and  all the pic of Aisha were crappy.

So to summerise i think we need to evaulate why certain things are the way they are in our communities, why with the blecahing cream? why is that a viable business? we know it can cause all kinds of medical maladies and we all condemn it use, but we should ask ourselves why people want to use it in the first place, it is not as simple as saying “it’s the desire to tan in reverse”  people can use bronzing pearls for that and the last time someone ingested mercury or benzines from that i may have been asleep (it has not happened). Blecahing creams are damging, imagine if white people’s suntan lotions were found to contain carcinogens and mercury, people would be screaming from the roofs, so why aren’t we? Is it a nessecary danger for our women folk? a means to an end?

 come on people lets have a serious debate because it really is more than skin deep!!!

Permalink 2 Comments

when the racist is your family!!!

April 28, 2009 at 1:01 pm (bigotry, black people, britain, colorism, colourism, misery, racism, shadism) (, , , , , , , , )

My cousin is a RACIST!!!!!  I capitalised it because that is how grave the situation i am glad to report that she is a second cousin. unforunatley we share mitocondrial  dna (mother’s dna  we share a great grand mother).

She is the most foul degenrate RACIST, she  despises dark skinned black people. Yep that’s what we have, a black woman who despises people in her own family. I found our due to the extrem upset she caused.

Starting at the beginning lets talk about another relative let’s call her scarlett, she is the kindest,strongest woman any person could be. she helped out the RACIST who we shall call copper(because that is the metal that the lowestcurrency is minted in). Copper i assumed was nice enough, had her little family and decided she would set up a business, who helped her out with childcare, Scarlett would never let her pay and looked after her child morning till night when she was studying to do her degree at home. when copper confided that she was upset because she could not secure enough money from the bank who dipped in her pocket because she wanted her family to suceed…..Scarlett.

Scarlett is the powerhouse behind us all. ambitious not only for herself but for her whole family. when copper jeopodised her family and got caught cheating on her distraught husband who held peace talks and convinced her husband to give her another chance…. you guessed it

Anyhoo scarlett was looking through the  albums in coppers house, she noticed several family members were missing, including the ones that she had taken with copper’s kids when she had taken away for a weekend at  alton towers (theme park). she bluffed but Scarlett was suspicious, she said nothing.

later that week my other cousin was with copper noticed the same thing and asked about it. Turns out  copper has been cropping out the dark members from photos  and  it is not only cosmetic and aesthetic , she admitted that she felt they were disgusting to her physically and  mentally not so bright (oh god she said that!!).

Her white husband flew into a rage, he is the sane one in the relationship, he told her that she was mentally unwell and that her admission had changed her in his eyes and he felt uncomfortable being with her. she felt safe enough to admit this because she assumed that my other cousin being mixed race would agree. she did not, she told us all. Scarlett went to pieces, our powerhouse was so devastated, her love and efforts were for someone who thought she was subhuman.

So why should she get a pass on her racism because she is technically black. i cannot understand where she got her mentality but here is the worry, before any of this came out, her husband being socially responsible thought he would give back to the community , by signing up to black adoption agengy.

It is an ethical nightmare, black children in care need homes, but sending them to be raise by copper is like sending them to the kkk. her husband alone … fine. Her NO WAY!If she gets a dark skin child think of the  mental damage she will inflict , if the child needs loving disciplin she wont give it, she will assume that the child is just bad and not raise it.

so do i inform the agency that she is a racist who shouldn’t bring up phelm???

What to do???

Apart from feeling ashamed?

Permalink Leave a Comment

Why can’t we all just get along??

April 28, 2009 at 12:29 pm (Africa, Africans, bigotry, black community, black people, britain, colonialism, colorism, colourism, ignorance, media, multicultralism, racism, shadism, the caribbean, the diaspora, the world, west indians) (, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , )

 I was reading the  Black Snob the other day and one of her topic just struck me, it was about the  diaspora and the tensions and hatred that sometimes bubbles to the surface and the mutual distrust that  has grown up.

www.blacksnob.com/snob_blog/2009/4/20/why-cant-we-be-friends-the-diaspora.html

I am of west indian parentage and yes i am proud of my heritage, but that does not mean that i instantly disrespect or look down on any other part of the diaspora.I  was born and bred in England in the 1980’s and i grew in a large community of others of similar background, you were either white, black caribbean, asian pakistani or asian indian. that is as diverse as my hometown got. ther was only one african boy at my school and one boy did not dilute the overall caribbean flavor of the black community, we had carnivals and community evenings dances and thus it continued until the late 1990’s when we saw a lot of african immigrants mainly from southern africa and to a lesser extent Nigeria  and Ghana.

I couldn’t lie and tell you that there was rioting in the streets. But what we have is many communities co-existing that are mainly separate. The older generations i know generally were told in their youth under the british empire that  they were vastly inferior than white men who lived in britain, but even though they wereinferior to white anglo saxons in the mother country (England – what fucked up rhetoric that is !!), they were of course miles better than those other black people who had been cleeved  from them in the past.  Colonialism worked not only for the  advancement of the english language but for some very messed up racial ideals. the kind of racial ideals that asked people to devalue themselves   and invest in a racial hierarchy where they were almost always at the bottom, so colonist invented a hierachy where black people could place other black people at the bottom.

 My grandmother was amongst some of the more priveilaged black people in her island home, she grew up on a farm  that her family owned, her family employed others, she received an education beyond the reach of most of her peers she became a nurse. she recalls a missionary from scotland coming to preach, she was in her nursing station and remembers overhearing this missionary  preaching to sick children.

” You must strive to be as good as the pure white children in my parish in london, you must elevate yourselves above your  base instincts, above the savagery behind africa,you and your progeny must be above your own origins “

It was 1957.  My grandmother did not hear the end of his speech she had to tend  to an old man.

She assures me that she was fed a steady diet of such contempt for africa and aficans. her own grandfather was a white irish man who had married a black woman and her mother (my grandmother’s mother)  had angered him greatly by having babies with a man with an african mother. the “mullato” classes were socially engineering themselves to be less and less visabily black and those who flouted those convensions were punished harshly. It was the mental  and physical distancing of black people in the caribbean from slavery and africa, this was a country where to be black or african in appearance was to be a slave.

It’s understandable, i would not want to be a slave nor mistaken for one. thus began a west indian pathology that saw africaness as something terrible, something to be despised.African coming to the caribbean after the Emancipation in 1838 were speaking african languages,  some reminants of those languages survive but  that was all. their  languages were banned and mocked by the ruling classes as jabber, mumbo jumbo. it was seem in those less pc days as stupidity, any  person with a brain could speak english after all…

When my grandmother arrived in England after a journey across the atlantic to spain and a train from southern spain to northern spain and then a ferry to england to meet my grandfather. Her eyes were opened to the lies of her colonial upbringing. England was not the home of christendom ,most of the people there were not even as half as devout as most black people back “home”, she saw licentiousness on a scale she had never seen. She was told that in her homeland that black people were the base and carnal by nature and sexually incontinent. but she came to a land where it was all much worse!

After 3 months she met a fellow medic at work Dr (spelling may be wrong) Ateti from somewhere in West Africa she forgets (bless her she is an old lady after all). They shared many silent lunch breaks. one day they started talking and he confessed that he was  surprised that she was not loud, agressive criminal or ignorant as he had grown up believing west indians to be. they had cross words but then realised how they had been bamboozled by colonialisation. they had a good friendship until my Grandfather put a stop to it. He  was not having his wife form friendships with any other man. he was less educated he was not coming from a wealthy background and probably held the friendship to be a threat to the marriage based on the stereotypes he had been fed about african men.

The 70’s were a blur of confusion, some parents fed their children the same crap that they themselves had been fed about africa  and africans, until Reggae and Rastafarianism took off. The final nail in the colonial bs in my community was alex haley’s roots and the  tv series. that and actually meeting real flesh and blood africans, no they did not seem that different! they were not sexually incontinent, nor  the vicious villains of the colonialists.

I can only speak from experiance and cannot say what things were like on the african side of  the fence. But i can say it was not only a west indian to African line. Starting primary school i was ruthlessly teased and punched( to the point of nosebleeds) by lets call him AA, who joined in the racist bullying by calling me “blackie” i pointed out that he was black too but  that was apparently  not important since me reasoned  “yeah ,but you’re blacker than me!”  But i sweep him under the carpet.

I want to talk about my ExBoyfriend who is African his name is Brown,  we have a backstory if you want to know more check out my other blog  cold nights no romance.

www.noromance.wordpress.com

 

 we dated for 3 years in that time he called me jamaican (i am not jamaican),said things like “you west indians” in a tone i doubt he would tolerate about africans. “you are all the same so why can i not call you jamaican” (it takes 4 hours on a jet to get to jamaica from my island and there is not even a direct flight. he mocked my cultral  heritage glibly and refused to acknowledge it until we were screaming at each other and i pulled up something african and used it in the same  context. we parted ways on non ethnic basis BTW.

That is how far we have come, we can date  but  we need to realise that yes we can be proud of our cultral differences without it being a denial of someone elses culture, when i say Anansi stories are integral part of caribbean culture i am not denying it’s ghanian roots  what i am saying is that it is as much west indian as african. Anansi had to evolve in the middle passage, we have different stories and different situations. we owe you the chracter, but he is ours too!

i digress, we have to do a lot of soul searching all of us and recognise that we need to emancipate ourselves of colonial blinkers over our eyes.

Permalink Leave a Comment

I know jesus was jewish, why is that problem for others?

April 15, 2009 at 7:18 pm (bigotry, faith, religion, the world) (, , , , )

I was reflecting on the images i have seen over this holy season, Easter the very festival that makes me christian. Easter is the reason why i am not part of a jewish faith. I love and respect the old testement as much as  i do the new.

 I have seen so many aryan jesus depicted, jesus is always depicted hanging from the cross with a giant loin cloth, disguising his circumcision, when in all truth people were probably crucified nude. Nowhere is he depicted with his curly hair which is noted as being “like woodshaving”.

It does not matter in the grand scheme of things, but i think it will do a great deal to erase some of the anti semitic elements in some churches, who hold to the idea that jews killed christ (idiotic at best, deadly and racist at worst). You only have to look at the horrendous tirade that Mel (drunk as a skunk)Gibson made. The arguement that jewish people killed christ does not hold water, judas may have betrayed him but does one man hold responsibility for all men of their race? No one ever sugguested that italians are responsible for the flux that is the middle east; really by that flawed logic you could say they caused it because the romans expelled most of the jewish people from the holy land 90 or so years after the death of jesus. Nope not heard that one.

I have seen people depict mary and infant jesus in many different ways but i have never seen a mary who had the stereotypical jewish phenotype, not to say she should  be wearing a yellow star or have exagggerated  features  but never have  i seen a young mary and seen the looks of a woman who was born  and bred in the middle east, who was racially(more importantly religiously) jewish. I have seen depictions of women who look like their entire genome belongs in scandinavia,the netherlands or northern europe.

It is not really the images that matter to people who have true faith, but i feel that christianity does have problems in relation to the jewish faith, we need to have more respect for people of the jewish faith and the jewish  faith itself, they gave us the old testement, and in return for the past 2 millenia we have repayed them with pogroms, hatred, discrimination and forced conversions. we need to grow the fuck up! our religions are divergent but that does not mean that we have the right to pray for their conversion(just insulting), or to confront them with things we know to be offensive or dirty to them (if you do that, pig is the right name for you).As for the lies and mistruthes that their is a world wide network of jewish people ruling the world…..PAH!!! what a load of nonsense, sorry if there was a network of jewish people controlling the world tell me why isreal the jewish homeland is constantly at war internally or externally,   people need a stable base to control things outside their domain, look at the british isles, in  10th century england was created 955ad. then it rapidly started  it’s colonial conquest of wales and scotland and made a furtive  grasp for ireland. whilst those nations were still grasped by internal conflict and eventually over the years they fell to the organised ( and contempt worthy) england. My point is if the idea wasn’t so powerful it would be laughable.

Can we all repeat after me “there is nothing wrong with acknowledging  jesus was Jewish and if he were born today he would go to synagog, The jewish faith is just as sacred as my own ”

Permalink Leave a Comment

Housing crisis and bigots!

March 18, 2009 at 9:29 pm (bigotry, britain, families, housing, media, multicultralism, news corperations, politics, the world) (, , , , , , )

Whats been irking me for the best part of the last decade is the housing crisis and misguided peoples false beliefs that all the blame can be laid at the door of immigrants. One group  of  papers that  is partial to this particular line of journalism, is “the DAILY MAIL” and the “DAILY EXPRESS” i find that their mild brand of xenophobia is cultivating a culture of fear amongst the cherished “middle  Endland” that they foundly talk of.

They bolster the cries from the far right, that  “african immigrants are given council homes above waiting english tenants” or that “asian immigrants fiddle their benefits to cheat” or  “polish people are taking all the bedsits”. I can barely read one of these papers without runing into the shrill cries of “white people will be  minorites in our  own country!” these are the phrases  of the far right of course,  The aforementioned papers are a tiny bit more respectful than that. That i believe that is down to the fact that their journalists are a tiny bit more educated than the average far right politician/supporter.

Now  i feel that the housing shortage in this country  is a lot more complex than just “bloody foreigners”.  i will outline my beliefs below.

-In the 1980’s Margret Thatcher sold off a large portion of our social housing, thus places are restricted.

-People  are living longer thus they are not returning housing stock to the market, thus increasing the “value” of the remaining houses on the market by the scarcity of the commidity.

-the buy to let market is one that has allowed several wealthy, or middle class persons to buy up second homes, or several properties. this increased their own personal wealth, while pushing the housing market further  skyward by  making the commodity even scarcer.

-People are living differently in modern society, the housing stock is still largely consistant of family homes, 4 bedroom, 3 bedroom houses. While many more single households are existance than ever before. so thus if the needs of people who need to be housed are not being met by the houses that are suplied we obviously have a situation when people will have to wait for an adquate house is found, they may watch people with differening circumstances  appear to waltz in and be housed straight away because the house best suited to their requirement is availible.

So there we have it, in my opinion.

What really pisses me off is that bigots take the easy route they do not even try and be intelligent about it they just pull thoughts out of the sky and do not be rational about  your arguements.

they cant see that life exepectancy would have anything to do with it. if people used to die at  maybe 65-73 and now they die on average 79-100 that is about 20 additional years that their home will be occupied, thus a family who is waiting for that home when they are 65 will have to wait 35 years for that home to become availible, by which time lets assume they have grown up and  their children might be awaiting  a home.

Margret thatchers government sold off a large portion of social housing,  that stock was never replaced, despite the growing population, the tory government was selfish, greed was good, and in essence i can understand their arguement that home ownership is a good thing, but it was not given a sustainable plan.

The buy to let market has also chocked the private market as well.  This market  has been driven by greed, it took up homes that struggling families needed and  priced them out of  the market.  This is especially hard in rural areas where the wealthy city living elite bought up summer homes in beautiful areas  that they only inhabit maybe 3 weeks out of 52. meanwhile the local folk often on vastly different wages  look on  while their housing market ascends out of the range of their pockets, they cant afford the homes in the region and sometimes have to move away from  their area to raise families.

So instead of everyone  realising or trying  understand they are assaulted with this mistruths that  it’s all down to the fact that foreigners are comeing into the country and other such vagrants. The question is when was the time when we did not have foreigners coming to our country? Queen Elizabeth the  first was dismayed at the sight of so many “blackamoors” and  the tolerant folks up north had several anti jewish pogroms in the middle ages as they were seem as foreigners.

Yes we have people coming to the country and if they pass all the revelant tests then they will be housed in  the same fashion to you.But our problems started with us and the way we have handled our housing and business over the past 30 years.

Permalink Leave a Comment

I hate people who base their opinions on stereotypes.

March 3, 2009 at 8:19 pm (black people, britain, ignorance, media, the world) (, , , , , , , )

I despise people who base their opinions of people based on stereotypes. Today has been a reall humdinger for them, they seem to be around every single corner.

Sitting down with a young colleague of mine ( well they are 22) while we had a deep and meaningful over lunch putting the worlds to right, she talked about how she  hated how her community was portrayed in the media and how it was affecting how people interacted with her as a person. she is a pakistani, but born and raised here in the uk , she is a muslim and no does not wear the hijab, she  is very beautiful and funny. I love this girl we have know each other for 5 years.

we were reminiscing over an event  in 2004 when we were talking about our communities, we had not known each other long then, she made a hurtful faux pas. She insulted my mother, she made the assumption that my sister and i did not share the same father, when i corrected her she then assumed that my parents were not married. She was very comfortable in making these assumptions to my face and we exchanged a few heated words. i put her right. How dare she make such assumptions, she only knew me on sight, i would not have made an assumption about her or her family, because it is likely that i may be wrong and i had nothing to base them on. whoops !!!! she was momentarily cowed.

The Thursday 7th July 2005 the day that a few  so called muslims blew a few tubes and a bus up and took 56 people to their deaths. This girl and myself happened to be working the evening shift together. By the time we signed in for the evening we had an idea of who had done the act, we had been seeing the scenes since 9 that morning. People started with the ignorance. She was teary eyed when we started.  we talked in hushed tones, she had already  been on the recieving end of harsh looks and while people hadn’t done anything she had noticed that on her walk in that people had been spitting very close to her. By the end  of that week she was exhaugsted she had had a huge row at college with some very thinly veiled racism.

she was fed up by august she had gone for a week in ibiza and she had  been treated like a criminal, she  was singled out for  extensive questioning, her luggage was searched over and over, and tipped out and all her underwear was displayed for all to see. she missed her flight and was put on the next availible one with an upgrade… little consellation.  ” people see my skin and hair , they see my ethnicity and then they guess my religion and then everything changes… they do not see a person any  more, i stop being singular… i become a threat,  so great is this threat people  have to intimidate me, humiliate me. like i’m responsible for every muslim and every pakistani.” In that moment i knew she understood why i felt so  insulted when she made those assumptions. It was sad that she only understood when people  started to do the same to her.

Today we sat down talking about some vast nonsense when a young guy sat down with a few cronies, they all had some kentucky fried chicken. I was being good and eating a bacon, chicken casear salad. So from where i sat the smell of the heartattack inducing fried (stroke in batter) chicken, smelt very good. i murmered something about the smell being so inviting.  mr diversity 1900, said                         “god you black people love fried chicken do you eat anything else!”  and  i was scratching my  head, while the table of men dissolved into laughter. where the hell did he get that impression? I generally hate chicken and white meat, love red meat, chicken is meat for people who cannot afford better animals.  but fried chicken is a rarity  on the grounds that  it’s greasy and not as nice as wagamama’s or my local restaurant noodle nation.

I refused to argue with him on the grounds that when i try and do something like that i usually  get called an “angry black woman” and that usually ends in more  arguing and thus perpetuatng an untrue stereotype.  they then started to mock  some other black female stereotypes, this man seemed to  base his entire image of black women on what you see on maury and yes he hit upon the paternity shows.

DREAD!!!! that is what i did not want to hear, i had to argue with him after he started to super impose the actions of the slutty few onto most black women. He got vile, so did i.  he  was being vocal about how these women. but he did not leave it personal, he said black women, i told him that black women were not the only ones on that paternity show,  and i did not like the way he was broadcasting it  although it was exclusive to black women. I said thats like saying that all  paedophiles are white  based on the fact that all the paedophiles  i saw on crimewatch were white.

 I thought i was doing well, i did not raise my voice, i stuck to the topic i did not even swear at  the ugly cunt. but oh here is the surprise i got called unreasonable, i was an angry  black woman and  whats more the ugly cunt thinks he touched a nerve…… well with the torrent of abuse i got  i guess the whole paedophile thing must have touched a nerve… (just kidding)

Permalink 2 Comments

Next page »